Monthly Archive for June, 2006

It’s Working (So Far)

Well, I got the last of my shipments in from NewEgg today.  Everything came fine.  1 BIOSTAR nVidia GeForce 6800XT with 512mB of RAM, 1 400 watt power supply, 1 70mm fan, and one 80mm fan.  The second I got the items in the house, right after thanking the UPS guy, I went to work.

First, I opened my computer up and took out the old, broken 70mm fan and replaced it with the new one.  I quickly turned my computer on to make sure that the fan was working and indeed it was.  I’m not sure if this is an issue with the BIOS or whatever, but the CPU fan speed keeps reporting 0 RPM, while the system fan speed is being reported correctly (at about 2800 RPM).  The temperatures right at cold boot weren’t bad at all (well, they shouldn’t have been).  So, I thought I would replace the next parts all in one swoop instead of testing each one.

Next, I took out my power supply.  This was a little dangerous because eMachines somehow managed to cram it next to the DVD drive and CD-ROM drive and right above the heatsink of the CPU.  I had to be extremely careful because if it dropped, it would smash my CPU heatsink.  After getting that off and unplugging everything, I somehow managed to put the new one in there.  After several minutes of trying to untangle the cords and make them at least somewhat orderly, I plugged the graphics card in.  The fit is a little tight, but doesn’t seem to stress or bend the card in any way (ironically, though, the weight of the power cable going to the onboard fan seems to weigh the card down a bit, but it’s not too bad).  Right now, I’m leaving the computer open-cased while I monitor the temperature of the system.

So then, I turned my computer on and booted up to Windows XP.  Things were looking pretty good and all I needed to do was to install the new drivers for my card.  After doing that, I set up my monitors so that they would act as dual monitors (and not clones of each other, which is the default setting) and I was on my way.  It played Halo fine with full quality graphics at 1280×1024, Gunz fine at full graphics for everything, and Armagetron at full quality as well.  I haven’t tried any other games yet, but I probably will soon.

Right now, I’m re-installing Windows Vista 5384 onto a spare hard drive (it got corrupted somehow) and when it’s done, I will test out the Aero Glass function.  I’ll post some screenshots of that too.

I’m such a genius.</sarcasm>

In life, there are always instances where brilliant actions are accompanied by incredibly stupid ones. This happened to me the other day when working on a computer project.
It all started several months ago when I angrily realized that my eMachines T3092 was running at only 1.3GHz when it should have been running at 2.167GHz. I discovered that this was because the frontside bus clock speed had been limited to 100MHz. Had it been clocked to 166MHz, the processor would run at the correct 2.167GHz. The package said that the processor would run at 2.167GHz, the eMachines website said that the processor would run at 2.167GHz, but my computer sure as heck wasn’t running at 2.167GHz. I had clocked the speed with Everest Home Edition, as well as going directly into my BIOS and looking at the speed.

The eMachines BIOS is incredibly limited in terms of options. Basically, you have just a few options that allow you to set the video card priority, boot device priority, etc. Thus, I wasn’t able to change the frontside bus clock speed. For many months I had been angered by this, but I had been angered even more by the fact that I had overlooked this until now.

I found an interesting website called http://www.emachineupgraders.info/. This site provides a lot of information on hardware included in eMachines computers. There is also a fairly large section involving modded BIOSes that give advanced options to the user. Unfortunately, I never saw a BIOS for my motherboard, the FIC AU31. However, the other day, out of a stroke of pure luck, I had just happened to visit the eMachines Upgraders forums and there on one of the “newest posts” for a category was “Modded BIOS for AU31″ or something like that. Someone had provided a link, too, with a modded BIOS for the AU31 that would enable the user to do things such as overclock their computer! So, I downloaded the 256kB file (I had already backed up my BIOS and found that it was a 256kB BIOS). Then, I backed up absolutely everything on my computer; I made a list of programs, I backed up software and documents to two different hard drives, etc. And then I sat there, wondering if I should really attempt to flash my BIOS. If the new BIOS didn’t work, there would be a good chance that my computer would be dead forever; it’s next to impossible to fix a broken BIOS other than buying new hardware. After staring at my screen for a few minutes, I decided that the possibility of running my computer at the speed it was meant to be run at outweighed the possible risks (which was an incredibly stupid decision in retrospect). So, I used WinFlash to flash the entire BIOS with the new modded BIOS and then restarted my computer.

The screens went blank. I started to get nervous. I restarted the computer. Both monitors were completely blank and were reporting that there was no incoming signal. I became very nervous. I unplugged the CMOS battery, plugged it back in, and turned it on. The screens were still blank. I became very scared. Then, I remembered that I forgot to unplug the power cable. So I did that, and unplugged the CMOS battery again. I waited for a few seconds, plugged them back in (my hands were shaking like crazy by now) and turned the computer back on. The screens were still blank. Then, after restarting one more time in a fit of rage, by some great miracle, the eMachines logo popped up on my second monitor. I went into the BIOS and changed all my settings back to their original ones, the only difference being that I was now able to set the FSB to 166MHz. I saved the changes, restarted my computer, and booted up Windows. My processor was previously being recognized incorrectly when it ran at 1.3GHz (Everest called it an Athlon XP 1700+), so after I had flashed the BIOS, it must have recognized it correctly as an Athlon XP 3000+. Probably for that reason, I had to reactivate Windows. I had felt that my computer had loaded faster than usual, but I wanted to confirm that, so I loaded up Everest and the processor was clocked at 2.167GHz! I nearly flipped over in my chair. Finally, I could run the computer the way it was meant to be run. Muahahahahahha. After a few more tests, things seemed to be working perfectly. I don’t know if it was just a coincidence or a result of a BIOS flashing, but my Norton AntiVirus subscription ran out. I think it was a result of the flashing because it reset my date and I forgot to change it. I’ll fix that problem later.

All this time, I had been running my computer open-cased with a large fan helping to blow air away from the processor and so forth. I was curious to see if the motherboard around the processor was heating up too much, so I felt around it. The temperature seemed normal. But then, my pinky accidentally hit the CPU fan attached to the heatsink on the processor and a blade flew off. The fan became unbalanced and stopped, my computer blue-screened, and I desperately fished around in the back for the power cord and pulled it out. There was my incredibly stupid act after the brilliant one.

None of my other computers had a 70mm fan, so I snapped off a blade roughly on the other side in attempt to balance the fan out a bit. The computer would run okay and the fan would make a little noise, but it was vibrating pretty badly, so I shut off the computer out of fear that I would destroy my processor.

Well, I ordered a new fan off of NewEgg.com this morning, so it should be here by Thursday or Friday. I also ordered another 80mm fan for my case, a 400 watt power supply, and a BIOSTAR 512mB nVidia GeForce 6800XT graphics card with 256-bit memory interface. The total came to a little over $200 with shipping. I had been looking at that graphics card for a while, so it’s not like I bought that out of spontaneity. Anyways, I can’t wait for this stuff to come so I can install it and use my computer again. For now, I’ll have to just use my laptop (which isn’t so bad).

A Formidable Opponent for a Fox

With the increasing popularity of Firefox also comes an increasing resistance against it. Websites like FirefoxMyths.com and others have sprouted up to dispel some of the outrageous claims that some fanboys have made about this browser. They don’t seek to completely bash the browser; their goal is just to tell the truth. Although FireFox is safer in terms of not having the security flaws that Internet Explorer does, it still has had some nasty holes that the wonderful folks at Mozilla keep patching up. The claims that it is “liek omg soooo much fastr thn everithin else” are bogus because various speed tests have shown that there are browsers that are faster to load, browsers that are faster to render pages, etc. And it certainly doesn’t use fewer resources than all other browsers. There seems to be a bit of a memory leak problem because even with just a few tabs open after browsing for a while, I can find the program using over 100mB of memory on my main computer. Well, also the fact that I have multiple extensions installed has contributed to the high memory usage.
I use Firefox on my main computer because I use a lot of extensions, such as AdBlock, Web Developer Tools, BetterSearch, Tab Mix Plus, ChatZilla, ColorZilla, DownThemAll!, Gmail Notifier, CuteMenus 2, IE Tab, ForecastFox, and a few others. Amazingly, even with all these extensions installed, my browsing experience is actually quite fast and the plugin support for videos, etc. is great. For a (mildly) powerful desktop computer, Firefox is really the perfect browser if you seek to use some if its exclusive features like extensions.
My laptop is not quite as powerful. It’s an HP Pavilion N5470; it has a 1gHZ CPU which clocks down to 600mHZ and 300mHZ to save battery life, and has 256mB of RAM. I like to keep this computer as streamlined as possible so that it will be very fast. It actually boots up much more quickly than my desktop PC does because very few programs are installed. I originally used Firefox on this computer a lot, but when reading some results of various speed tests for browsers, I discovered just how fast and powerful Opera was. Originally, I had never really liked Opera because it displayed ads on unregistered browsers and always seemed kind of bloated. Unfortunately, I only saw it work on Linux systems. Results from http://www.howtocreate.co.uk/browserSpeed.html#winspeed show that Opera 9.0 is faster than Firefox 1.5 in every single category. To quote the author of the page, “Firefox and Mozilla are clearly optimised for Linux, and Opera is clearly optimised for Windows.” The cool thing about Opera now is that they have gotten rid of ads and so forth, which makes me happy. So, I decided to test it out on my laptop. I accidentally started out with the latest build of Opera 8, but when testing it, I was at first very pleased to see the speed at which it worked. I began to play around with settings a lot and was able to get it to do some cool stuff. I was not as pleased, however, when it didn’t load up the background to the main menubar on my website. I was planning a fix for this when I downloaded Opera 9 and upgraded my previous installation. When I tested my website again, the menubar worked again! Opera 9 is pretty cool and quite fast. It is perfect for my laptop because I don’t have any complicated extensions to run, etc. I just want a browser for browsing. But for my desktop, FireFox stays, simply because its support for extension is unmatched by any other browser.
This article is the product of not having anything to do at 5:00 in the morning. Oh, I wrote this with Writely, an awesome online word processor. I can give out a few invitations if anyone wants any. See http://writely.com/ for more information.

Beta Testing: Windows Vista, Office 2007, Google Spreadsheets

Well, in the past few days, I have been beta testing some new software. Windows Vista, Office 2007, and Google Spreadsheets have been 3 such pieces. Here, I have included some screenshots of each piece of software as well as some personal notes on use.

[Note: This, like the software I have tested, is in beta.  Actually, it's in alpha.  Well, more like pre-alpha.  I'll keep updating it as I go...]

Windows Vista

http://www.microsoft.com/windowsvista/getready/preview.mspx

    Well, I think I should first say that I am extremely happy that Microsoft is allowing regular users (i.e. non-MSDN subscribers) to beta test their software. In fact, I think it’s totally 1337 of Microsoft to do that because the only other way to obtain a beta would be by getting a leaked version (>.>).

    Having said that, I had a spare hard drive that only had some random stuff on it, so I thought I would install Vista on that so that I wouldn’t mess up my current hard drives because the beta supposedly has some problems with dual booting because of a new boot manager. It’s a 40gB Maxtor drive, but has a copy of Windows XP installed on it already. I didn’t want to erase it, so I created a 20gB partition in the drive and gave it to Vista and imagined that I would manually use a partition manager to change the active drive since the copy of Windows XP that was already on there goes to a different computer. Okay, so that’s good; got a hard drive. I tried booting from the installation DVD after having burned it and it took FOREVER to load. I knew something had to be wrong there. And sure enough, there was something wrong. After a while, it bluescreened on me. After another try, it told me that it needed drivers for the DVD drive, which is absolutely stupid because it’s running from the DVD drive… So then, I tried an alternate method. I installed Windows XP on that drive. Then, I ran the DVD from Windows XP and selected a custom option that would move all the old files over to a different location called "Windows.old" (and then I would just delete the old files). Installation seemed to proceed nicely (unfortunately, I had to leave it before the installation ended). When I got back, it was ready to be set up with some very basic options. I set these options up and everything worked perfectly fine. My computer specs are as follows:

  • AMD Athlon XP 3000+ processor 1.3gHZ (Note: the processor should run at 2gHZ, but the motherboard is clocked incorrectly at 133mHZ FSB, so that reduces the processor speed. It was too late after I found this out, so I couldn’t return it. The sad part too is that the company who makes this PC is a major retailer).
  • 1gB RAM
  • 40gB hard drive (normally 2x 160gB drives)
  • DVD+/-RW drive
  • CD-ROM drive.
  • nVidia GeForce 2 MX AGP card
  • Matrox PCI card
  • (built in GeForce 4 MX chip that overheats and shuts my computer down when playing games)


    For such specs, Vista actually doesn’t run all that slowly upon first boot. One of the things that I don’t like is how it takes up over 550mB of RAM. Seriously, that’s a huge amount for an operating system with nothing else installed yet. I just really can’t imagine what on earth Vista is doing that takes up so much RAM. My computer has an overall rating of 1, which kind of ticks me off. I suppose that after I put it on a real hard drive and install a new graphics card (will talk about that later), I can push it to a 2 or a 3. 1 is kind of harsh though. The most annoying part though is that if I ever want to upgrade my RAM to 2 gigs, I will have to remove both 512mB modules and install 2 1gB module.

    Concerning the graphics cards. The integrated GeForce 4 MX chip on my computer kept overheating and shutting my computer off when playing games. It also randomly bluescreened when playing games as well. So, I had to rip out an nVidia GeForce 2 MX 32mB card from another computer in order to play any games at all. Yes, I have been playing the Halo Demo and Unreal Tournament on such a graphics card. Halo is unbelievably slow even on the lowest settings. Windows Vista will have support for computers with graphics cards having pixel shader support, something that almost all gaming cards have these days. The other generic Matrox card that I have there has 4mB of video RAM and is used for my second monitor. I have been looking at buying a new card for a while. I am probably going to buy a BIOSTAR GeForce 6800XT card with 512mB of RAM and a 256-bit memory interface. With the exception of the memory being GDDR2, it is a really high quality product for the price (around $150 at NewEgg). This card is fully supported by Windows Vista, so I won’t have a problem. I will also be able to play games at an FPS higher than 15… XD

    The current screenshots have been taken with my GeForce 2 MX card of course because there’s no transparency nor much else there. You should be able to get a copy from the link above if you’re not too late. Because of the huge demand, it occasionally gives you an error message when clicking on the download link. If you have a good download manager (I used DownThemAll for Firefox), it should be a fairly easy download if you don’t click on the "Download with Akamai Download Manager" link.

    The OS itself is very nice. I like the level of customization power that you are given. However, it seems a little bloated. I have yet to experiment with most of the features of the OS. However,looking at the basic OS itself, it looks quite nice. I tried a few gadgets. Nothing new… They’ve been around since like Mac OS 7 or so (anybody remember the eyes that follow the cursor?). I’ve used Kapsules on Windows before, and they look quite nice. These gadgets are nice because they are more integrated with the OS and the sidebar is partially transparent. Overall, I like what I see here, even though I have a gut feeling that Microsoft has a long way to go before this OS becomes commercial-grade. It feels really "betaesque" to me still, even for this late in the game.

Screenshots:
These screenshots have been taken on a virtual machine so that’s why the resolution is lower than 1280×1024, which I normally use. Click on them for a larger view.
Screenshot
Screenshot
Screenshot
Screenshot
Screenshot
Screenshot
Screenshot
Screenshot
Screenshot

 

Microsoft Office 2007

http://www.microsoft.com/office/preview/default.mspx 

    After figuring out that they had kept releasing the same version of Office just under a new name, Microsoft realized that they needed to change things up a bit and actually try to make their software useful for a world that has progressed since 1990.  Just kidding, but sort of not really.

    Microsoft Office 2007 sports a new, clean look, an easier method of getting to the functions you need, built-in ClearType support, and a whole slew of other functions.  I have tested a lot of the software included in Office 2007, but I think by describing the three main ones (Word, Excel, and PowerPoint), you’ll get the idea.

   Word 2007.  I’ve used this software the most.  While still a little buggy with things such as picture manipulation, the new version of Word is a pleasure to use.  I can quickly the functions that I need to access easily.  I like the idea of being able to select some text and automatically have a box fade in (very smoothly), displaying the most common formatting options.  Speaking of fading in very smoothly, all the buttons are nice and have a glowing effect to them.  This is common throughout the new version of Office.  Everything looks quite nice.  Word has a nice feature to save a file to PDF, but unfortunately, Adobe is pressuring Microsoft to cut it.  Microsoft says that they will, but will offer a free "Save to PDF" plugin on their website.  This new version of Office is actually quite an improvement from the previous one.  Oh, and apparently, Word 2007 has support for blogging.  I haven’t tried it yet though (am using Flock right now to post).

[Screenshots] 

    Excel 2007.  I haven’t used this software that much yet.  However, from whatever use I have had, I would say that it is quite nice.  It’s very clean and feels less bloated than previous versions of Excel (even though it’s a bit slower on my machine).  [Will add more later.]

[Screenshots] 

    PowerPoint 2007.  I tried this out but gave up rather quickly since it is still incredibly buggy.  Moving pictures is a pain, it’s generally quite slow, and keeps crashing very often.  However, it does look promising.  This version of PowerPoint has a lot of nice features.  Text can be formatted in special ways that previous versions can’t do.  Also, this version has better theming support, so your slides will be more effective.  I haven’t had a chance to play around with this software much since it crashes pretty often.  But very nice anyways.

[Screenshots] 

 

 Google Spreadsheets

http://spreadsheets.google.com/ 

    Imagine Microsoft Excel, only online.  That’s what Google Spreadsheets is.  By using very complex ActiveX stuff, Google has created an incredibly powerful spreadsheet program that works right on your browser.  I have tested it with Internet Explor(d)er 6 and 7 beta, as well as FireFox, but will test it with Safari later on.  Although it doesn’t have a lot of features yet, the ones that it does have are pretty much bug free.  The cool thing about it is that you can collaborate on a spreadsheet with other people.  The software will automatically handle saving, etc. from multiple people.  All the data is saved on Google’s servers, so if your computer crashes, your spreadsheet will be fine (so long as you saved, of course).  This is a really nice piece of software.  I can’t wait to see the full version.

Screenshot
Screenshot
Screenshot

 

Dream Computer

While I was (and still am) waiting for both of my hard drives to defragment on my other computer, I decided to build a “dream computer” on NewEgg.com.  I didn’t go very far into it, but the total rang up to be like $3300.  $900 for the processor, $900 for the hard drive (10000 RPM), 2 gigs of ram for like $400, $300 for the motherboard, $400 for a good graphics card, $400 for a case and water cooling (although it would probably be much higher because I didn’t spend a lot of time looking for cases).  I would want a full size case because the mid-size ones just aren’t big enough…  That’s not even getting into disk drives, sound cards, or anything else.  If anyone wants to send me $5000 for a new computer, I’d be a very happy person.  Just kidding…  ^.^

It won’t be long before AMD has its new 4×4 chips in the mainstream market.  I would love to build a new computer with quad processors.  Vista will have a lot of support for such really high end hardware, which is why I’ll wait until like Q3 of 2008 or so before I start researching to build a new computer.

I’m thinking of putting Google AdSense on my website so that I can make enough money to cover a portion of the cost of such a high end computer in the future.  If I make the minimum $100 for the next 20 months, that’ll be $2000 right there.  Hopefully with the popularity of MoPiD, people will click on the ads.  Of course, they should only do so because they are interested in the product.  Google strictly forbids random clicking and I respect that (after all, companies have to pay each time their ad is clicked).  Hopefully, I’ll get AdSense in by August.
I also want to buy myself a high(er)-end laptop eventually, something that can run Windows Vista moderately well.  I would imagine the cost of such a laptop would be around $1500 once companies start dropping their prices.  Interestingly enough, the laptop that I am using now (HP Pavilion N5470) cost around $2100 when it was bought because it was one of the best desktop replacements available at the time.  The screen still remains so beautiful.  14″ screens are still pretty common whereas this one is 15″.

Money, money, money…  All this equipment would cost so much…  Guess I can keep dreaming for several more years.  :D